News & Politics  
comments_image Comments

Why GOP and Breitbart Smear Machine Fell for 'Friends of Hamas' Joke

Breitbart.com's report suggesting Pentagon nominee Chuck Hagel had received "foreign funding" over the years from a terrorist-friendly group called Friends of Hamas mistook snark for fact.
 
 
Share

Chuck Hagel on a trip to Iraq
Photo Credit: Lance Cpl. Casey Jones/Wikimedia Commons

 
 
 
 

If you want to appreciate how vast the digital divide is that historically separates conservative  failures and liberal  accomplishments online, and if you want to add some context to the recent  New York Times Magazine feature article on how Republicans' chronic online shortcomings dim the party's electoral chances, just look at how the two camps were marking their time in recent days.

Working with Republicans on Capitol Hill trying to block Chuck Hagel's nomination to become Secretary of Defense, Breitbart's Ben Shapiro recently  posted a report suggesting Hagel had allegedly received "foreign funding" over the years from a terrorist-friendly group called Friends of Hamas, but that the payments were being kept secret. The allegation served as part of the right wing's relentless campaign  to smear Hagel as being anti-Israel.

Fox Business host  Lou DobbsNational Review columnist Andrew McCarthy, and AM talker Hugh Hewitt  all hyped Breitbart's  conspiratorial narrative about Hagel's nefarious connections with Friends of Hamas.

Slight problem. Last week, Slate's David Weigel detailed how Friends of Hamas  doesn't actually exist. And as New York Daily News reporter Dan Friedman  explained, he unwittingly started the Friends of Hamas rumor when he posed the Hagel question to a GOP aide in the form of "an obvious joke." According to Friedman, he asked about both Friends of Hamas and the "Junior League of Hezbollah," and thought that the "names were so over-the-top, so linked to terrorism in the Middle East, that it was clear I was talking hypothetically and hyperbolically."

The GOP aide then apparently shared the Friends of Hamas inquiry with other partisans and Friedman posits that from there it found its way to Breitbart, which published it in the form of "news" under Shapiro's byline. Tellingly, the fact that the scary sounding group doesn't exist didn't stop a right-wing site from pushing the tall tale; a tale that quickly ricocheted across the conservative media landscape and was touted as a Deeply Troubling Development.

It was against that backdrop of routine right-wing dysfunction that the  Times published its lengthy article. Author Robert Draper argued -- and many Republican operatives agreed -- that the GOP's perennial online failures have made it almost impossible for the party to communicate effectively with younger voters; voters who have developed a deeply hostile perception of the GOP brand. (i.e. "Polarizing," "narrow-minded.") Draper didn't make reference to the Friends of Hamas debacle, but it could have served as a useful example of how  routinely unserious online pursuits have become among Republican boosters.

By comparison, note Monday's news that left-leaning  Mother Jones won a prestigious Polk Award for the  big campaign scoop David Corn posted online last September about how Mitt Romney, while addressing wealthy donors, disparaged "47 percent" of Americans who "believe they are victims."  The blockbuster report, complete with an undercover video, was the fruit of a  month's worth of digging by Corn.

The Friends of Hamas farce, coupled with the Polk Award, represent useful bookends when measuring the widening gulf that separates liberals and conservatives online, and how one side has completely  lapped the other. (Seven years after its launch, players are still trying  to create the "conservative Huffington Post.")

I realize the  Times piece focused on "the Republican Party's technological deficiencies,"  the lopsided battle for a social media edge,  revolutionary campaign software, and how senior Republicans are still reluctant to even engage via Twitter. The piece cast a spotlight on how information, and better information, is shared faster and more widely among liberals than it is among conservatives.

But you can't really take what the right-wing media, and specifically bloggers, are doing online and separate that from the GOP's chronic, failed  attempts to use the Internet to win elections and bolster its brand. The two are permanently attached.

 
See more stories tagged with: